Why mid-market GCs can’t afford manual CO workflows anymore—and how a modern platform mends the leak without adding overhead.
The Moment the Drawing Changes
It usually starts with a red-lined PDF or a field sketch on a superintendent’s iPad. A dimension shifts, a spec tightens, an owner has a late epiphany. That one mark-up becomes a “small” change order—then multiplies:
- Extra procurement steps for materials that weren’t in the original take-off
- Schedule reshuffling to accommodate rework and new inspections
- Payment delays while everyone argues about scope and cost
For Maria Singh, a project manager at a $90 M GC, the cascade looks like this:
Day 1: the electrical foreman emails a $12 K CO request.
Day 3: the architect wants backup drawings, the CFO wants the new budget line, the owner wants to know “Will this slip turnover?”
Day 7: crews are on standby, interest on the credit line keeps ticking, and Maria’s inbox has 47 messages titled RE: RE: RE: CO-057.
She’s not alone. Construction analysts estimate 10 % of total project cost is tied up in change orders, and more than half of them take 5–15 days to resolve.
Why Today’s CO Process Feels Broken
- Fragmented Intake – CO requests arrive via email, text, even WhatsApp.
- Opaque Routing – Approvals bounce between architect, GC, subs, and finance with no clear SLA.
- Manual Data Entry – Each status change is re-typed into spreadsheets, ERPs, and schedules.
- Reactive Visibility – By the time leadership sees the impact, cost variance is already baked in.
The result? 11 % average budget variance on projects where COs linger in approval purgatory.
A Smarter Model: The IRIS Framework
To replace that chaos, leading mid-market contractors are adopting IRIS—a four-step, software-driven framework that compresses approval cycles and restores margin.
Early adopters report 48 % faster approvals and 30 % fewer pay-app disputes after 90 days.
The Technology Piece—Subtle but Essential
You can force IRIS into spreadsheets, but the friction usually returns. Modern construction-ops platforms weave the pillars into everyday workflows:
- Smart CO Forms—field crews snap photos, speak notes; software tags CSI codes automatically.
- Drag-and-Drop Workflows—approvers get SLAs and escalations; no one “forgets” a signature.
- Single Data Spine—once the CO flips to Approved, budget and schedule modules refresh instantly.
- Immutable Audit Log—every click, comment, and file version time-stamped for owner audits.
(Full disclosure: Linarc ships with these capabilities out of the box—but any tool that treats change orders as first-class data will move the needle.)
Putting IRIS to Work—A 30-Day Pilot Plan
Week 1 — Standardize Intake
Roll out one CO request form to your busiest project. Make attachments and schedule impact fields mandatory.
Week 2 — Automate Routing
Build the approval chain in your software, set 24 h and 48 h reminders. No more manual chasers.
Week 3 — Turn on Live Dashboards
Show every open CO by age and value during the weekly OAC. Watch how decision speed picks up.
Week 4 — Sync to Finance
Link the CO module to your ERP; approved values appear in the next pay app automatically.
Measure two metrics: approval cycle time and budget variance drift. If they don’t improve, iterate before scaling.
The Payoff: Fewer Surprises, Faster Cash
- 3–7 days shaved off pay-app cycles—owners see current costs, not last month’s guess.
- Crew idle time drops—field teams know scope is cleared, not “pending email.”
- Owner confidence rises—transparent CO logs reduce retainage and pave the way for repeat work.
In Maria’s case, the first project using IRIS saw CO approval time plunge from 6.4 days to 2.8 days and recovered 3.5 % of gross margin—enough to fund next year’s drone survey program.
Ready to tame your change orders?
Download the free IRIS checklist—or watch a 90-second walkthrough of a CO moving from field request to approved budget line in real time. Your next pay-app might thank you.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.svg){kind=icon}
